MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LENTERA: ANALISIS KEPRAKTISAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN SAINS PADA MAHASISWA PGPAUD

Ni Luh Ika Windayani

doi:10.25078/pw.v10i2.5537

Authors

Ni Luh Ika Windayani STAHN Mpu Kuturan Singaraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25078/pw.v10i2.5537

Keywords:

LENTERA Learning Model, Practicality, Science Education, Early Childhood Teacher Education, Early Childhood Education

Abstract

Early childhood science education plays an important role in developing a range of skills, including critical thinking, problem-solving, and a basic understanding of natural phenomena. However, science intructuin in higher education particularly in Early Childhood Teaher Education (PGPAUD) programs still often relies on convensional approaches that do not actively engage student. Therefore, this study aims to increase students involvement in the learning process so that they develop analytical and critical thinking skills and are better able to connect theory with real-world practice. The LENTERA learning model was designed to enhace student engagement in learning science for childhood education. Through a seven-stage learning syntax known as the 7 steps (introducing the problem, reviewing theory, proposing hypotheses, collecting data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and respoting result), this model is expected to improve students understanding of science concept as well as their pedagodical competence. This study employed a research and development (R&D) method focused on assessing the practicality of the LENTERA learning model. Practicality was evaluated using the Criterion-Referenced Assessment (PAP) and the result indicate that the model achieved a high practicality score

References

Aisyah, S., Widiasih, Sukmaning Adji, S., Andayani, Prabowo, S., Hadianti, S., & Zakirman. (2022). Analysis Of Student Engagement: ECE Educators Teaching Skills Strengthening Courses In Distance Education. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 16(2), 261–270. Https://Doi.Org/10.21009/Jpud.162.06

Ardimen, & Gustina. (2018). Penguatan Budaya Meneliti Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset di Perguruan Tinggi. 21(2). Http://Ecampus.Iainbatusangkar.Ac.Id/Ojs/Index.Php/Takdib/Index%0

Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. In Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Dantes, N. (2021). Evaluasi Dan Asesmen Pembelajaran. Undhiksa Press.

Fitri, R., Jamaris, & Solfema. (2022). Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme Dalam Perkuliahan Keanekaragaman Tumbuhan. 6(1), 1–11.

French, L. (2004). Science As The Center Of A Coherent , Integrated Early Childhood Curriculum. 19, 138–149. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ecresq.2004.01.004

Granjeiro, É. M. (2019). Research-Based Teaching-Learning Method: A Strategy To Motivate And Engage Students In Human Physiology Classes. Advances In Physiology Education, 43(4), 553–556. Https://Doi.Org/10.1152/Advan.00034.2019

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What And How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. Https://Link.Springer.Com/Article/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.F3

Izza, F. R., Saptono, S., & Irsadi, A. (2025). Mini Research Learning On Ecosystem Material Based Semarang Lo- Cal Potential Towards Critical Thinking And Environmental Aware- Ness Among Elementary School Student. 14(1), 69–78. Https://Doi.Org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.15294/Usej.V13i1.21135

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models Of Teaching 9th Edition (9th Ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Khumraksa, B. (2021). The Use Of Research-Based Learning To Promote An Active Learning In Science Learning. CMU Journal Of Education, 5(1), 58–74.

Kiljunen, J., Sointu, E., Äikäs, A., Valtonen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2024). Higher Education And The Flipped Classroom Approach: Efficacy For Students With A History Of Learning Disabilities. Higher Education, 88(3), 1127–1143. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10734-023-01162-1

Kiswanto, D., Arista, D., Fitrah, I. J., Annisa, M. N., & Qomari, N. (2024). Implementasi Penilaian Acuan Norma ( PAN ) Dan Penilaian. 10(3), 1207–1219. Https://Journal.Unnes.Ac.Id/Journals/Usej

Maulidya, B. A., Budi, H. S., & Suryandari, K. C. (2015). Aplikasi Model Research Based Learning (RBL) Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter untuk Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Ipa Di Kelas V Sdn 3 Selang Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. FKIP UNS Journal.

Michael, J. P., & Richard, M. F. (2006). To State A Theorem And Then To Show Examples Of It Is Literally To Teach Backwards. Learning, 95(2), 123–138. Http://Mate.Calpoly.Edu/Media/Files/Review_Inductive_Learning.Pdf

Mmassy, Z. P. (2024). The Influence Of Student Self-Regulatory Learning Strategies On Academic Achievement In Open And Distance Learning Environments: A Study In Tanzania. European Journal Of Research And Reflection In Educational Sciences, 12(1), 1–15. Www.Idpublications.Org

Pramudya, E., Indreswari, H., Hotifah, Y., & Koen, B. (2023). Filsafat Progresivisme Dalam Pendidikan : Systematic Literature Review. 11(2), 83–88.

Shulman, L. S., & Suzanne M. Wilson. (2004). The Wisdom Of Practice: Essays On Teaching, Learning, And Learning To Teach. 11(2). Https://Doi.Org/DOI:10.5860/Choice.42-1702

Suharyani, Rosyanafi, & Jalal, B. P. R. (2025). Rekonstruksi Pendekatan Andragogi Dan Pedagogi Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Mahasiswa. 11(September), 331–343.

Wardani, A. D., Munir, A., Lestari, L. A., & Anam, S. (2024). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Their Relationship to Grammar Achievement Of Undergraduate English Department Students. LLT Journal: A Journal On Language And Language Teaching, 22(1), 46–57. Https://Doi.Org/E-ISSN 2579-9533, P-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 26, No. 2,

Worth, K., Winokur, J., Crissman, S., Heller-Winokur, M., & Davis, M. (2009). The Essentials Of Science And Literacy A Guide For Teachers. Heinemann.