FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL IN HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARACTER EDUCATION LEARNING AT SMA NEGERI 1 KENDARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25078/vidyottama.v10i1.6606Keywords:
flipped classroom; Hindu religious education; character education; student-centered learningAbstract
Improving the effectiveness of Hindu Religious and Character Education requires an instructional model that actively engages students in the learning process. One innovative approach applied is the flipped classroom model, which shifts learning from a teacher-centered paradigm to a student-centered one by encouraging independent study prior to classroom interaction. This study aims to analyze: (1) the rationale for implementing the flipped classroom model in Hindu Religious and Character Education at SMA Negeri 1 Kendari, (2) the process of its implementation, and (3) the implications of its application for student learning outcomes. This research is grounded in meaningful learning theory, constructivist theory, and humanistic learning theory. A qualitative descriptive method was employed, with data collected through observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis. The findings reveal that the flipped classroom model significantly enhances student engagement and conceptual understanding. Students who access learning materials independently through videos and modules demonstrate better preparedness for classroom discussions and problem-solving activities. The teacher’s role evolves into that of a facilitator, mentor, and motivator who provides guidance and feedback. Moreover, the implementation of the flipped classroom model positively influences students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, contributing to the development of independent, creative, religious, and responsible character traits.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Proceedings of the 120th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain. David McKay.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Pudja, G. (1999). Bhagavad Gītā: Teks Sanskerta, terjemahan, dan penjelasan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Hanuman Sakti.
Republic of Indonesia. (2003). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System. Ministry of National Education.
Sari, I. P., & Hamami, T. (2022). Pengembangan metode flipped classroom dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5416–5425. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3420
Zainuddin, Z., Habiburrahim, H., Muluk, S., & Keumala, C. M. (2019). How do students become self-directed learners in the EFL flipped-class pedagogy? Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1–23.










