ANALISIS DISKREPANSI PEMANFAATAN RAPOR PENDIDIKAN PADA JENJANG SEKOLAH DASAR SESUAI PERMENDIKBUDRISTEK N0.9 TAHUN 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25078/aw.v10i2.5749Keywords:
Analisis Diskrepansi, Pemanfaatan Rapor Pendidikan, Perencanaan Berbasis DataAbstract
This study aims to identify the level of gap in the use of education report cards as the basis for data-based planning at the elementary school level in Ampenan District, NTB Province, as mandated in Permendikbudristek Number 9 of 2022. The approach used is qualitative descriptive with a gap evaluation model. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires and observations of 25 educators and education personnel (PTK) who were randomly selected, consisting of school principals, teachers, and school operators. The data was analyzed using the Wilcoxon graded mark test to measure the difference and the size of the gap to the established standard. The results of the study show that the gap in all stages of the use of education report cards is relatively small. The details are as follows: (1) the implementation of AN has a small gap with a difference of 0.8; (2) identification of service conditions using education report cards there is a small gap with a difference of 0.71; (3) reflection on determining the focus of service improvement for the next year there is a small gap with a difference of 0.68; (4) the preparation of learning planning according to the data on the education report card there is a small gap with a difference of 0.75; (5) mapping the need for competency improvement so that educators and education personnel (PTK) are able to carry out service improvements, there is a small gap with a difference of 0.6; (6) the preparation of RKT and RKAS according to the improvement priorities on the Education Report Card there is a small gap with a difference of 0.58; (7) the implementation of the activity planning that has been prepared there is a small gap with a difference of 0.87; (8) Revision of planning and budgeting based on the results of reflection there was a small gap with a difference of 0.62.
References
Ariasa, I. W., Marheni, A. A. I. N., & Widiartini, N. K. (2019). Analisis diskrepansi pelaksanaan layanan tupoksi bagian dan sub bagian di lingkungan Biro Akpk Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha sesuai dengan Permenristekdikti Nomor 14 Tahun 2016. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2)
Dantes, N. (1983). Variabel penelitian dan perumusan hipotesis. Singaraja, Bali: Jurusan Ilmu Pendidikan, FKIP Unud.
Dantes, N. (2012). Metodologi penelitian. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Divayana, D. G. H., Ariawan, I. P. W., & Adiarta, A. (2022). Design of new evaluation model based on Discrepancy Daiwi Asuri Sampad. Emerging Science Journal, 6(1), 166–184. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-01-013
Jumini, S., Rusilowati, A., Sutikno, S., Cahyono, E., Parmin, P., & Firdaus, F. (2021). Discrepancy evaluation models in physics project-based learning of student entrepreneurship character. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(2), 022042. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1918/2/022042
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2022 tentang Evaluasi Sistem Pendidikan oleh Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta, Indonesia.
Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds.). (1983). Evaluation models viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Model Discrepancy Sebagai Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. PALAPA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(1). https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/palapa
Provus, M. M. (1969). The discrepancy evaluation model: An approach to local program improvement and development. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh Public Schools.
Salin, I. M., Dantes, N., Ketut, G., & Sunu, A. (2014). Analisis diskrepansi pelaksanaan kompetensi kepala sekolah berbasis Permendiknas Nomor 13 Tahun 2007 di lingkungan sekolah dasar Seraya Timur, Kecamatan Karangasem. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan UNDIKSHA, 5
Saputra, N. M. A., Wahyu, R., & Rahman, D. H. (2022). Evaluation of counseling programs at junior high schools in Malang Regency during the Covid-19 pandemic: Discrepancy model. KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling (E-Journal), 9(2), 157–166. doi:10.24042/kons.v9i2.12223
Sherly, Kisno, Mudjisusatyo, Y., Purba, S., Dharma, E., & Sihombing, H. B. M. (2023). Discrepancy evaluation model on certification competency test implementation of vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 56(1), 149–159. doi:10.23887/jpp.v56i1.53843
Steinmetz, A. (2000). The discrepancy evaluation model. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 127–143). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-306-47559-6_7
Supranto, J. (2000). Statistik teori dan aplikasi (Edisi ke-6). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Suyasa, P. W. A., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2021). Modification of cse-ucla and discrepancy as a new evaluation model in education. Emerging Science Journal, 5(6), 929–942. doi:10.28991/esj-2021-01321
Widyastuti, W., & Haryanto, H. (2023). Evaluation of inclusive elementary school learning in Yogyakarta. Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3), 2768–2779. doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.1064
