STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI ELITE LOKAL DAN UMAT HINDU DALAM PRAKTIK TABUH RAH PENGANGON PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 DI DESA ADAT KAPAL KECAMATAN MENGWI KABUPATEN BADUNG

Authors

  • I Ida Bagus Surya Negara Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar
  • Ida Bagus Gede Candrawan Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar
  • Made Redana Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25078/anubhava.v1i2.1079

Keywords:

Communication strategy, Local Elite, Covid-19 Pandemic

Abstract

One of the traditions in Bali that is still preserved today is the Tabuh Rah Pengangon Tradition in Subak Tegan, Traditional Village of Kapal. This tradition is carried out once a year at harvest. In 2019 the world was shocked by the Covid19 virus. The development of the virus is quite massive and the increase in cases in Indonesia has resulted in the government taking preventive measures by implementing Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB). With circulars from the Bali provincial government and PHDI, the role of local elites is important in conveying information to the public. This study focuses on discussing the essence and communication strategies used by local elites and Hindus as well as the religious system that took place during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This study uses a qualitative method with an empirical approach. Data collection was done by interview and observation techniques. The results show that the essence of communication used is ritual communication which is carried out as a form of habitual behavior. The communication strategy between local elites and Hindus is divided into 3 stages, namely the planning stage by holding sangkep, the preparation stage by distributing notification letters by kesinoman and the implementation stage of the local elite overseeing the event. During the pandemic, the Tabuh Rah Pengangon tradition process continues, it's just that the implementation is now limited to 25 people, the venue is reduced and the health protocol is still implemented

References

Muslih Basthomi 2020. Urgensi KomunikasiDalam menumbuhkan Motivasi di Pandemi

Covid-19.

Budyatna, Muhammad dan Ganiem, Leila Mona.2012. Teori Komunikasi Antarpribadi.

Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Bungin, Burhan. 2011. Sosiologi Komunikasi.Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Cangara, Hafied. 2010. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Craib,1986.Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: PT

Raja GravindoPersada.

Evi Zahara. 2018. Peranan Komunikasi Organisasi Bagi Pinpinan Organisasi.

Hamidi. 2004

Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Aplikasi Praktis Pembuatan Proposal dan Laporan Penelitian) UMM Press: Malang.http://kabarwashliyah.com/2013/

/30/elit-lokal-bangun-daerah-harusmaksimal.

Widyantara,

I Gede Suka (2020) Peranan Bendesa dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa

Tanah Waris di Desa Adat Buduk.

I Gusti Ngurah Sudiana, Wayan P Windia, Relin

DE. 2016. Prajuru Desa Pekraman Rohaniawan Hindu Dan Hukum, Denpasar:

Bali Santi Pusat Pelayanan.

Ida Bagus Yudha Triguna, 2000. Teori Tentang

Simbul, Denpasar: Widya Dharma.

Koentjaraningrat, 1990. Pengantar Ilmu

Antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

M. N. Nasution, 2004. Manajemen Jasa

Terpadu, Bogor Ghalia Indonesia. Moleong,

Mark dan goodson., 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif . Bandung :

Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, Deddy, 2008. Komunikasi Massa.

Bandung : Widya Padjadjaran.

Poerwadarminta. W.J.S. 1987. Kamus

Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Poloma,M.Margaret, 2003 Sosiologi

Kontemporer, Jakarta: Kencana.

Pudja, dkk.

Dalam bahasa sansekerta metodedalam pramana . Jakarta: Lembaga

Penerjemah Kitab Suci Weda.

Pratiwi, C. A. (2017). Harai: Telaah KonsepReligi Koentjaraningrat. Japanology, 173-

Puja I Gede, 1982. Siwa Sesana, Jakarta: Proyek Pengaduan Kitab Hindu Departemen

Agama. Puja, G.1997. Sarasamuscaya. Surabaya: Paramita.

Puloma, Margaret M., 2003. SosiologiKontemporer. Jakarta : Raja Grafin

Riswadi, 2009. Pengantar Komunikasi.Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. Singarimbun,

Efendi, 1995. Metode Penelitian Survey,Jakarta: PT Pustaka LP3ES.

Suasthawa Dharmayuda, I Made. 2001.DesaAdat (Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat diPropinsi Bali). Denpasar : Upada Sastra.

Sudirsa, I Komang, 2008. Dampak TajenTerhadap Kehidupan Keluarga Bebotoh

ditinjau dari Ajaran Etika Hindu di DesaAdat Pasedahan, Kecamatan Manggis,Kabupaten Karangasem. Denpasar : IHDN.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian KuantitatifKualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suranto Aw, 2011 KomunikasiInterpesonal, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.Surat Edaran Guburnur Bali Nomor:267/01-B/HK/2020. PembatasanSosialBerskala Besar.

Tabroni. 2001. Metodelogi Penelitian SosialAgama. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wayan P.Windia2 (2017) Keberadaan Desadan Adat Bali Serta PerananBendesa Adat. E-Jurnal, Dosen Unud Bali.

Mahendra, Oka. 2001. Ajaran Agama HinduTentang Kepemimpinan, Konsep Negara danWiweka. Denpasar: Manikgeni.

Ruliana, Poppy. 2014. Komunikasi Organisasi:Teori dan Studi Kasus. Jakarta: Rajawali

Pers.

Sudirga dkk, Ida Bagus. 2004. Widya Dharma Agama Hindu 1, 2 dan 3. Bandung: Ganeca.Siagian, Sondong. P. 2003. Teori dan Praktek

kepemimpinan, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Sudarta, W. 2008. Penerapan Tri HitaKarana di Subak Kawasan Perkotaan (KasusSubak Anggabaya, Kota Denpasar).Denpasar: Jurnal SOCA, Vol. 9, No.2, Juli 2012

Fakultas PE Unud.

Surpha, Wayan. 1993. Eksistensi Desa Adat di Bali. Denpasar: PT. Upada Sastra.

WHO. (2021, juni 13). WHO Coronavirus(COVID-19) Dashboard. Retrieved from WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard: https://covid19.who.int/

Widjaja, A.W. 2000. Ilmu Komunikasi PengantarStudi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Published

2021-09-30
Abstract viewed = 58 times