KAJIAN HERMENIUTIKA PADA KARYA MAHAYASA DENGAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25078/lg.v2i1.6462Keywords:
Mahayasa, Artificial Intelligence, HermeneutikaAbstract
This study examines the meaning of Mahayasa's digital artworks produced with the aid of Artificial Intelligence technology through a hermeneutic approach. Mahayasa's works, which combine traditional Nusantara cultural values with modern AI-based aesthetics, present complex and multi-layered interpretative dimensions. Through the hermeneutic framework of Gadamer and Ricoeur, this study highlights how the process of "horizon fusion" between the cultural context of the work and the experience of the viewer opens up a dynamic dialogue of meaning. In addition, works produced by AI algorithms are understood as the result of collaboration between machines and human creativity, forming a "digital hermeneutic circle" in which meaning continues to evolve. This study shows that although Artificial Intelligence technology facilitates the creation process, the interpretative aspects and aesthetic value still depend on the active role of the artist and the viewer. Thus, Mahayasa's AI-based works not only represent technological innovation in art but also maintain philosophical depth through an open and layered interpretative space.
References
Ahmed Elgammal, Liu, B., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2017). CAN: Creative adversarial networks, generating “art” by learning about styles and deviating from style norms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.07068.
Annette McCosker, & Rowan Wilken. (2020). Machine vision and visual culture: AI art and the mediation of meaning. Media International Australia, 177(1), 51–64.
Hans-Georg Gadamer. (2004). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.
Hito Steyerl. (2021). Mean images: Artificial intelligence and visual epistemology. e-flux Journal.
Ian Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Yoshua Bengio. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 2672–2680.
Jon McCormack, Gifford, T., & Hutchings, P. (2019). Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. Leonardo, 52(1), 56–63.
Lev Manovich. (2022). Artificial aesthetics: Generative AI, visual culture, and computational creativity.
Paul Ricoeur. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Visual Art and Design Studies: Les-Guet's

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.















