EKSISTENSI KAIN IDUP PANAK SEBAGAI MEDIA KOMUNIKASI SOSIAL DI DESA TENGANAN KARANGASEM BALI

Authors

  • I Gusti Ngurah Agung Panji Tresna Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Ida Bagus Sastra Lingga Kusuma Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25078/anubhava.v2i1.359

Keywords:

Existence, Idup Panak Textil, Communication Media, Communication Strategy

Abstract

Idup Panak woven textil is one of the traditional textil in the Tenganan Pegringsingan Traditional Village. Idup Panak textil as a work of weaving art has its own uniqueness compared to other gringsing fabrics because it is made using leftover threads from other ready-made motifs. Idup Panak textil are starting to increase in existence and the quantity of sales is getting bigger. Of course, it is necessary to strengthen the principles of meaning and value in maintaining the quality of the textile, of course, in order to avoid a decline in cultural understanding. Departing from the problems above, this study aims to strengthen the construction of values ​​and principles contained in the Idup Panak textile. The method used is a qualitative research method using interview techniques, observation and literature in data collection. This study uses symbol theory which will assist in analyzing the symbols contained in the Idup Panak Textil and the Communication Strategy Theory which functions in the development of the Idup Panak Textil so that all forms of principle values ​​contained in the Idup Panak Textil are preserved. The results show that action has begun. duplication of Idup Panak Textil in order to meet consumer demand, this has resulted in craftsmen starting to experience social blindness which only prioritizes quantity and puts aside the meaning of value, it is very necessary to educate and supervise to face increasingly advanced developments bringing this tradition in a positive direction with meaning values ​​that are still maintained .

References

Amy, 2010. Kajian Estetik Penolahan Kain Gringsing Tenganan Karangasem Bali. Jurnal Dimensi Seni.

Basrowi dan Suwandi, 2008. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Cholid Narbuko. 2012.Metodelogi Penelitian. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. Depdikbud, 1991. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka Geertz. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture. New York : Basic Books Inc. Gulo. 2004. Metodelogi Penelitian. Jakarta : Grasindo.

Gunawan, Imam. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara.

Hamidi. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Aplikasi Praktis Pembuatan Proposal dan Laporan Penelitian. Malang : UMM Press.

Iqbal, Hasan. 2002. Pokok-pokok Metode Penelitian dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Indonesia.

Koentjaraningrat. 2005. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta Mestika. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Morissan. 2013. Teori Komunikasi Individu Hingga Massa. PT. Prenada 2013. Jakarta.

Talal Asad. 1993. The Construction of Religion as an Anthropology Category in The Genealogy of Religion : Disiplin and Reason of Power in Christyani and Islam. Johns Hopkins. University Press.

Victor Turner. 1974. Drama, Fields and Metaphors : Symbolic Action in Human Siciety. Ithaca and London Cornell University Press.

Bagus. L. 2002. Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Lodra, I.N. 2015. Di Balik Kain Tenun Gringsing Tenganan, Karangasem. 1st Ed. Bali: Werdi Sila Kumara Silakarang.

Prayatna, I. 2020. Analisis Makna Pada Estetika Kain Tenun Gotia di Desa Adat Tenganan Pegringsingan. Jurnal Dimensi Seni Rupa dan Desain. 16(2): 129-138.

Puja, I. Astariyani, N. Suprapta, I. Siti, N. 2016. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Budaya di Desa Tenganan, Kecamatan Manggis, Kabupaten Karangasem, Bali. Majalah Aplikasi Ipteks Ngayah. 7(1): 56-64.

Yudha Triguna, 2000. Teori Tentang Simbol. Bali: Widya Dharma

Published

2022-04-30
Abstract viewed = 199 times