EVALUASI KRITERIA PENILAIAN PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI BERBASIS COUNTENANCE

Authors

  • Eka Vasia Anggis 085755300450

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v9i01.2226

Keywords:

Biology learning, Countenance

Abstract

Education directs graduates to achieve the expected graduation so that a measurable assessment is needed based on the criteria set by the government. The purpose of this study was to measure the characteristics of the assessment of biology learning according to predetermined standards. The method used is the countenance evaluation method. The method is in the form of a consideration matrix and a judgment matrix in which there are antecedent, transaction and outcome indicators. The results of this study are that the highest indicator on the criteria for evaluating biology learning is authentic, while the lowest indicator is educative. The conclusion of the research is that the criteria for evaluating biology learning are classified as appropriate according to the standards set by the government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggis, E. V., & Laili, N. (2022). Techniques of Desaign Learning Planning Patterns. Jurnal Mangifera Edu, 6(2), 153–168.

Anggis, E. vasia, & Wulandari, R. W. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Kerjasama Mahasiswa. Gema Wiralodra, 11(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.31943/gemawiralodra.v11i1.103

Arikunto, S. (2020). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Aziz, M. (2019). Evaluasi implementasi standar penilaian oleh guru matematika di SMA negeri 3 watampone kabupaten bone. Jurnal Kependidikan, 13.

BAN-PT. (2019). Matriks Penilaian Led Dan Lkps Program Sarjana. 1–30.

Hofer, S. I., Holzberger, D., & Reiss, K. (2020). Evaluating school inspection effectiveness: A systematic research synthesis on 30 years of international research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65.

Kristín, A. (2022). Studies in Educational Evaluation ´ n Torfi J o. 74(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101181

Mendikbud RI. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan RI, 1–76.

Rigianti, H. (2020). Kendala Pembelajaran Daring Guru Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Elementary School, 7.

Six, F. (2021). Trust-based accountability in education: The role of intrinsic motivation. Routledge.

Sudjana. (2017). Metode Statistika. PT Taristo.

Wood. (2001). Stake’s Countenance Model: Evaluating an Environmental Education Professional Development Course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32.

Yusuf, A. M. (2015). Asessment dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Pilar Penyedia Informasi dan Pengendalian Mutu Pendidikan. Prenada Media Group.

Zhai, X., Haudek, K. C., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., & Wilson, C. (2020). Evaluation of construct-irrelevant variance yielded by machine and human scoring of a science teacher PCK constructed response assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 0–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100916

Published

2023-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract viewed = 229 times