Evaluasi Siklus Pelaksanaan Standar Dalam Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) Di STT Bethel Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v6i2.1647Keywords:
Sistem Penjaminan Mutu, Evaluasi, Siklus Pelaksanaan, Perguruan TinggiAbstract
Evaluation of the standard implementation cycle in the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) is very important, bearing in mind the standard implementation cycle in the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) is a benchmark of how the commitment of tertiary institutions to achieve the expected quality of education. This research was conducted at the internal quality assurance unit at STT Bethel Indonesia. The method in this study is qualitative, and data collection techniques use direct observation, document and archive searches, and in-depth interviews. The results showed that (1) Implementation of standards in the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) implemented by STT Bethel Indonesia used 24 National Higher Education Standards; (2) There has not been an equal commitment from all academicians to implement each standard in the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) in order to create a better quality of education; (3) The still dominant cycle of standard implementation in the field of education can be seen from the standards that have already been carried out as many as five standards, while for research and community service standards the standards implemented have not reached half the set standards.
Downloads
References
Arifudin, Opan. 2019. “Manajemen Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Mutu Perguruan Tinggi.†JIMEA | Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi) 3(c):01.
Creswell, John. 2015. Riset Pendidikan : Perencanaan, Pelaksanaan Dan Evaluasi Riset Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Elken, Mari, and Bjørn Stensaker. 2018. “Conceptualising ‘Quality Work’ in Higher Education.†Quality in Higher Education 24(3):189–202.
Flick, Uwe , Ernst Von Kardorff, and Ines Steinke. 2004. “A Companion to Qualitative Research.†Sage Publications 369(1):1689–99.
Gunarta, I. Ketut. 2015. “Universitas Hindu Negeri Modern Melalui Peningkatan.†Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu 1(Nomor 1):23–33.
Marchiori, Danilo, and LuÃs Mendes. 2018. “Knowledge Management and Total Quality Management: Foundations, Intellectual Structures, Insights Regarding Evolution of the Literature.†Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 0(0):1–35.
Pater, I. Made, I. Made Yudana, and Nyoman Natajaya. 2020. “Studi Evaluasi Implementasi Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal ( SPMI ) Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Budaya Mutu.†Jurnal Pedagofi Dan Pembelajaran 3(1):95–103.
Rahnuma, Naureen. 2020. “The Bangladeshi Higher Education Quality Assurance Framework: A Pathway for Transformation.†Quality in Higher Education 26(1):14–31.
Retnoningsih, Endang. 2013. “Knowledge Management System (Kms) Dalam Meningkatkan Inovasi Lppm Perguruan Tinggi.†Evolusi I(1):76–85.
Sauri, R. Supyan, Implementasi Tata, Pamong Dalam, and Penerapan Spmi. 2019. “Implementasi Tata Pamong Program Studi Dalam Penerapan Standar Dikti Melalui Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI).†Nusantara Education Riview 2(Nomor 2):117–28.
Sihotang, Hotmaulina, and Bernadetha Nadeak. 2017. “Leadership Based on the Internal Quality Assurance System in the Christian University of Indonesia.†66(Yicemap):35–43.
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan. Research and Developtment. Cetakan Ke.3 Bandung : Alfabeta.
Sulaiman, Ahmad, and Udik Budi Wibowo. 2016. “Implementasi Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Di Universitas Gadjah Mada.†Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan 4(1):17.
Permenristekdikti no. 62 tahun 2016 tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi (SPM Dikti).
Permendikbud No. 3 tahun 2020 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.
